Article Teaser - bsh archiv teaser
Technical Article

Feeding of Bulk Solids: A Review

Written by Carson, J.W. edited by mhd on 18. Oct. 2023
The benefits of mass flow have long been recognized: elimina­tion of ratholing, controlled flow of fine powders without flood­ing, minimization of segregation, defined and predictable resi­dence time for processing applications, no stagnant regions where particles can degrade, etc. Design techniques developed by Jenike [1] have been proven over the last 40 years in thou­sands of applications around the world in virtually every indus­try.

Jenike's work primarily focused on how to design the hopper section of a storage or processing vessel. By selecting proper hopper angles, geometry and materials of construction, condi­tions conducive to developing mass flow are present (2]. Unfor­tunately, mass flow doesn't always result even when these pa­rameters are all met. The problem is often related to the feeder and the manner in which it withdraws material from the hopper outlet.

Consider for example a hopper with an elongaed outlet which employs a screw feeder to control discharge. If a constant pitch, constant diameter helical screw is used, flow will be confined to the back end of the screw. As shown in Fig. 1, this preferential flow pattern will propagate up into the hopper above, enforcing a funnel flow pattern even if the hopper design meets the re­quirements for mass flow.

In this paper, common feeders used for bulk solids applications will be reviewed, and some of the common mistakes as well as proper design techniques will be pointed out.

Similar Companies
more ➥
Kraemer Tool & Mfg. Co. Ltd.
Kraemer Tool & Mfg. Co. Ltd.
Schäffer Verfahrenstechnik GmbH & Co. KG
Schäffer Verfahrenstechnik GmbH & Co. KG
Rotex Europe Ltd.
Hax Pneumatics Ltd.
Hax Pneumatics Ltd.
Paul Hedfeld GmbH
UniTech Industries Inc.
UniTech Industries Inc.
Write the first Comment