Cullet Conundrums

Posted in: , on 6. Jun. 2013 - 18:21

I am a Mechanical Engineering student and I am working at a glass crushing plant for the summer designing a type of sorting attachment for the output of the Midwestern MEV 5 deck screener that sorts the cullet into its various sizes (from 4 mesh down to 60 mesh and smaller). I basically have to be able to send any of the 5 screener outputs to any of 7 conveyors/bag houses/silos. We have settled on screw conveyors because they can extend the width of the screen preventing blockages at the output and they can have multiple outputs at various points along their extent. I have never encountered any bulk solids handling before and this must be the worst form of it to work with. The cullet and glass powder is literally sold to the abrasives industry but somehow we have to avoid wear while producing and handling it. Are screw conveyors even a viable option in this situation and do you have any recommendations for their application as well as ideas for chute solutions (linings, necessary angles, materials, etc.) I have reviewed a lot of the material you have posted on these forums to try to wrap my head around things but the abrasion problem is disheartening. Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated.

Re: Cullet Conundrums

Posted on 7. Jun. 2013 - 09:53

It is difficult to give more that general advise without more detailed information as to the proposed layout and feed rates. Abrasive wear can be minimised by running screws of reduced pitch construction slow and highly loaded. Intermediate bearings are definitely not to be used. The flights can be made of abrasive resistant steel and have a hard weld deposit on the leading edge rim. Investing in good design offers the best prospect of securing a long working life for such relatively tough duties.

Re: Cullet Conundrums

Posted on 7. Jun. 2013 - 01:51

The glass enters the crusher as 1/2" and smaller and supposedly has a density 100lb/ft^3. We are hoping to output a total of 50 tonnes an hour which translates (based on assumption of even output across all screens) to 184ft^3/hr on each screen. I used the manual found here: http://www.screwconveyor.com/SCC%20EngCat10LR.pdf in which they recommended only filling the trough 15% full for this very abrasive material. The clearance between screens on the screener constrains us so I was planning on running 9" standard pitch screws at slightly more than the recommended 55 rpm (or slightly fuller than 15% though in reality the screener is only rated for 40 tonnes.) Also the main reason for the use of screws was because we need something that runs the width of the screen to prevent the blockages we get now by trying to taper the 5' opening into a 8" pipe. I am under the impression that since the screen will be outputting evenly across its width that a feed screw is preferable to ensure even loading however we would ideally be able to reverse certain screws to send product to the left and right of the screener. For manufacturing simplicity and also to allow for a thin bed of product to line the trough to protect it we were planning on designing 10" square troughs (the 1/2" flight tip clearance should be enough since the product is 1/2" and smaller before entering the crusher anyway). The other supposed advantage of a screw was that we could take outputs at any point along its length, is that true? I read somewhere the flighting should have a gap at any intermediate outputs. In summary: 6 Standard pitch 9" screws in 10" square troughs, 15% full, 55 rpm, 5' wide evenly distributed input, reversible, multiple outputs along extent (10-12' long), to move 150-200cu.ft/hr each for a total of 40-50 tonnes of pure abrasives an hour. The boss man wants to know if it will work and I'm not sure. Thank you so much for your help!

Andrew

Roland Heilmann
(not verified)

Screws On Glass

Posted on 9. Jun. 2013 - 10:03

Hello Andrew,

in general: Screw conveyors is a correct choice, there's sometimes scraper or chain conveyors. Intermediate outlets are possible, that is to be designed into the basic layout. Mind moisture, it very much infuences flow behaviour. Flights / troughs might be made of abrasion resistant high strength steels, surface integrity (smoothness) is here essential, replacement possible during maintenance. Concerning flow: Do tests, or order specialist investigation. If you are in the Americas, there's J&J, but seek guidance as an error here might compromise the whole solution.

To achieve some level of design certainty, imo you'll have to involve a known supplier and lean on their know-how as per their binding offer. With that material, i personally think it impossible to achieve a supplier-independent solution without possessing own in-depth knowledge of technical and bulk material background and related system design. I'd think 3ce before trying to cut budget here.

I wish you good luck in taking the right way, have a nice sunday.

Regards

R.