Selecting Elbows

Author
(not verified)

Name:  PelletronLogo.jpgViews: 5601Size:  3.2 KB

Selecting Elbows for

Pneumatic Conveying Systems


by Paul Wagner, Pelletron Corp., USA

The right elbow can keep your system operating

at peak performance, reduce maintenance costs,

and minimize material attrition and elbow wear.

This article describes common elbows

and outlines factors to consider

when selecting one.


Several types of elbows (also called bends or sweeps are available for pneumatic conveying lines. Each design is suited to certain applications and has its own set of advantages and disadvantages. The elbow you choose influences the pneumatic conveying system’s performance, whether the system operates in dense or dilute phase and whether under pressure or vacuum.

An elbow provides a change in material-flow direction. This adds pressure losses to the system due to impact, friction and re-acceleration.

As product enters the inlet of the elbow, it typically continues moving straight ahead to the first (or primary) impact zone. The product is then deflected at an angle toward the outlet of the elbow. The deflection angle is determined by the elbow design, the product’s characteristics, the conveying velocity, and specific load (also called the product-to-gas ratio). In many designs, the product will hit one or more secondary impact zones before exiting the elbow.

Impact forces can cause severe degradation of fragile or breakage-sensitive products, generating a large amount of fines or dust and creating quality issues. Heat-sensitive products, such as plastic pellets, can overheat on the contact surface this can result in unwanted tails or streamers on the pellet or film build-up on the surface of the elbow, which can eventually lead to product contamination. Abrasive products can cause wear, leading to work-out elbows and system leaks and causing maintenance and safety issues.

Basic Designs

Elbows fall into two main categories:

•Standard elbow

•Specialty elbow

A standard Elbow is simply a straight pipe section that has been bent. The angle and centerline radius of the elbow can (at a given velocity) influence pressure loss across the elbow. Additional pressure losses are caused primarily by friction (as

the product concentrates and presses against the outside wall of the elbow) and/or impact losses (as elastic products bounce from one impact zone to another). Traditional standard elbows are typically used for bulk materials with no physical or thermal degradation issues.

Specialty elbow designs provide a controlled flow pattern to create, ideally, one impact zone where product hits other product instead of sliding along the elbow wall. They are typically used when conveying fragile or temperature-sensitive products.

The material’s phase and velocity changes affect the pressure loss of specialty elbows. These devices typically have higher pressure drops than standard elbows. The differences can vary significantly, depending on the product’s characteristics, system operating conditions (such as conveying velocities and product-to-gas ratios), and, of course, elbow design (the blind-tee elbow has the highest pressure loss.)

Standard Elbows

Made by bending a straight pipe, standard elbows are available in either long-radius or short-radius designs (Fig. 1). Long-radius elbows typically have a centerline radius that is eight or more times the pipe diameter whereas short-radius elbows have a centerline radius that is three to five times the diameter. Their advantages, limitations and applications are similar.

Advantages. Standard elbows are readily available in almost all materials of construction and sixes, and with a variety of different elbow angles. They have low pressure losses, and because there is no change in diameter, there are no cross-contamination issues. They also have low costs.

Disadvantages. Standard elbows need internal surface treatment when abrasive products are to be handled. Fragile products are subject to significant degradation due to the existence of multiple impact zones. Pellets or granular products generate high noise levels in standard elbows; and heat-sensitive products can smear and build up on the inside of the elbow. Standard elbows have low pressure losses; depending on the conveying velocity, the pressure loss across a short-radius elbow can be lower than that of a comparable long-radius elbow. The long-radius elbow requires a large space for installation, a short-radius elbow less space.

Recommended applications include the handling of powders or pellets that are non-abrasive, are not fragile, and have high melting points, in either dilute-phase or dense-phase systems. Short-radius elbows are nearly always preferred over long-radius ones, unless the latter would be easier to install.

(continued)

Attachments

pelletron_1 (JPG)

Author
(not verified)

Re: Selecting Elbows

Posted on 18. Jan. 2008 - 10:18

(continued)

Special short-radius elbow designs Several specialty short-radius elbows are available, primarily for abrasive products. They typically have a liner or a wear-plate insert in the primary impact area (Fig. 2). If that wears through, only the liner or wear plate needs to be replaced, not the entire elbow. Variations with different angles are available.

Advantages. Like the standard elbows, these styles are available in almost all materials and sizes and with different angles. They require less space for installation than standard long-radius elbows. And, because only the wear plate or liner needs to be replaced in case of wear-through, replacements costs are lower.

Disadvantages. Like standard elbows, these require internal surface treatment for handling abrasive products, their multiple impact zones can cause fragile products to degrade, pellets or granular products generate high noise levels, and intense exposure of head-sensitive product to the elbow walls can cause the product to smear and build up inside the elbow. Changes in the elbow’s cross-sectional area cause higher pressure losses and dead corners raise product contamination issues.

Recommended applications include the handling of powders or pellets that are moderately abrasive, have high melting points, and are not fragile. They are suitable for dilute-phase pellet and powder systems, but only for powders in dense-phase systems.

(continued)

Attachments

pelletron_2 (JPG)

Author
(not verified)

Re: Selecting Elbows

Posted on 18. Jan. 2008 - 10:21

(continued)

Blind-tee Elbow

The blind-tee elbow (Fig. 3) creates a product-to-product primary impact zone and eliminates the high-impact contact of incoming particles against the elbow wall. This reduces wear as well as degradation of fragile and heat-sensitive products.

Advantages. The blind-tee elbow can be made of different materials and with different angles. Its compact design requires less space than standard elbows, making it easy to retrofit. Wear and product degradation are low due to its product-to-product primary impact zone. It is the lowest-cost specialty elbow.

Disadvantages. The blind-tee has extremely high pressure losses. Dead zones and product pockets may lead to product cross-contamination. The secondary impact zone can raise wear and degradation issues.

Recommended applications are short, dilute- or dense- phase systems with dedicated product lines where product pockets are not critical. It can handle pellets or fluidizable powders that are abrasive, head-sensitive or fragile.

(continued)

Attachments

pelletron_3 (JPG)

Author
(not verified)

Re: Selecting Elbows

Posted on 18. Jan. 2008 - 10:26

(continued)

Spherical-chamber Elbow

This elbow, trade-name the Smart Elbow (from HammerTek Corp., Landisville, PA,

pelletron_4

href="http://www.hammertek.com" target="blank">http://www.hammertek.com) has a spherical vortex change opposite its inlet (Fig. 4). The chamber’s shape and location force the material into a rotating motion, producing a product-to-products primary impact zone at the entrance area of the chamber. The impact zone deflects the incoming particles upward at an angle toward the secondary impact zone, the re-acceleration zone, and eventually the elbow exit. It is available in 45-deg and 90-deg versions.

Advantages. This elbow is available in aluminum, stainless steel, carbon steel and special alloys. It has a defined primary product-to-product impact zone, a compact design with low space requirements, and low noise levels. It is suitable for both powder and pellet transfer.

Disadvantages. Depending on the velocity conditions, there is a high risk for product cross-contamination (although this is no an issue if the conveying line is dedicated to a single product). The product rotation in the chamber causes fragile products to degrade. Due to the deflection angle, a secondary impact zone may form, where wear and degradation can occur. Pressure loss is higher than that of standard long- and short-radius elbows; actual pressure loss depends on the products, with powders having lower pressure drops than pellets.

Recommended applications involve the handling of fluidizable powder products and pellets that are abrasive, heat sensitive and/or fragile. It can handle dilute- or dense-phase powders, and dilute-phase pellets.

(continued)

Attachments

pelletron_4 (JPG)

Author
(not verified)

Re: Selecting Elbows

Posted on 18. Jan. 2008 - 10:31

(continued)

Gamma Bend

Developed to eliminate the formation of streamers during the dilute-phase conveying of plastic pellets, the proprietary Gamma Bend elbow (from Coperion Waeschle, Weingarten, Germany,

pelletron_5

href="http://www.coperion.com" target="blank">http://www.coperion.com) features a cross sectional area change beyond the inlet, which slows done the incoming particles (Fig. 5). The specific angle of the back side of the elbow determines the deflection pattern and defines the product-to-product impact zone. The thickness of the product layer in the impact zone is determined by the product-to-gas ratio, and is optimized for typical dilute-phase design parameters. In front of the elbow exit, the widened area transitions back to the diameter of the pipe, re-accelerating the moving particles and creating a protective product layer. Due to the angle and area ratios, the protective product layer covers the entire back side of the elbow, providing a large impact and wear-protection zone. This elbow is available only with a 90-deg. angle.

Advantages. The Gamma Bend has a defined primary product-to-product impact zone, and a compact design with low space requirements. It has only a slightly higher pressure loss than standard long- and short-radius elbows, and it has low noise levels.

Disadvantages. Depending on the velocity conditions, there is some risk for cross-contamination of product. The creation of the product-to-product impact zone requires the maintenance of minimum product-to-gas ratios (approximately 5:1). This elbow is available only in stainless steel, and is suitable for pellets or granular products only.

Recommended applications are the dilute-phase handling of heat-sensitive or abrasive plastic pellets and granules.

(continued)

Attachments

pelletron_5 (JPG)

Author
(not verified)

Re: Selecting Elbows

Posted on 18. Jan. 2008 - 10:34

(continued)

Pellbow

This patented elbow design (from Pelletron Corp., Lancaster, PA,

pelletron_6

href="http://www.pelletroncorp.com" target="blank">http://www.pelletroncorp.com) resembles a standard short-radius elbow with a large expanded chamber between the inlet and discharge of the elbow (Fig. 6). After the inlet, a sharp step creates an area expansion within the elbow and a deceleration zone for the incoming particles. This slow-down leads to the formation of fluidized slurry in the product-to-product primary impact zone (as in the Gamma bend elbow). The slurry constantly moves upward toward the discharge and re-acceleration zone at the elbow exit.

The step just inside the elbow inlet creates a low pressure zone that draws the product from the primary impact zone back across the elbow’s bottom toward the inlet and into the main product stream. This allows a complete clean-out that is less sensitive to the actual conveying velocities than other elbows. It is a viable with a 90- deg. angle.

Advantages. This elbow’s benefits include a defined primary product-to-product impact zone, a compact design with low space requirements, and low noise levels. Its pressure loss is only slightly higher than that of standard long- and short- radius elbows. It is available in aluminum, stainless steel, carbon steel and special alloys, and is suitable for pellet and powder transfer. The step eliminates the build-up of product within the elbow, allowing for a complete purge.

Disadvantages. The creation of the product-to-products impact zone requires a minimum product-to-gas ratio of approximately 3:1.

Recommended applications include the handling of fluidizable powder products and pellets that are abrasive, heat-sensitive and/or fragile. It can handle the dilute- or dense-phase transfer of powders, and the dilute-phase conveying of pellets.

(continued)

Attachments

pelletron_6 (JPG)

Author
(not verified)

Re: Selecting Elbows

Posted on 18. Jan. 2008 - 10:46

(continued)

Choosing an Elbow

Selecting an elbow requires knowledge of the product to be conveyed – whether it is abrasive, temperature-sensitive, fragile, cohesive or elastic – and of the pneumatic conveying system – primarily whether it involves dilute-phase or dense-phase flow.

In dilute-phase conveying, the air velocity is high enough to keep the material being transported airborne.

The material is conveyed continuously and does not accumulate in the conveying line. The air velocity needed to suspend the particles is known as the saltation velocity.

Dense-phase conveying takes place at lower velocities. The material lies for periods of time on the bottom of a horizontal line. Fluidizable products generally flow though the conveying line in slugs, whereas granular products are pushed through the line as air percolates through the spaces between granules. Once the type of conveying and product characteristics is known, the table below can be used to identify elbows that may be suitable for the application. These are the main products commercially available today, and they should be able to cover a wide range of typical requirements.

For more information, please visit:

pelletron_picture

href="https://edir.bulk-online.com/profile/79-pelletron.htm" target="blank">https://edir.bulk-online.com/profile/79-pelletron.htm

pelletron_picture

href="http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=de-de&q=pelletron+site:bulk-online.com&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8" target="blank">http://www.google.com/search?client=...UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

pelletron_picture

href="https://forum.bulk-online.com/search.php?searchid=426828" target="blank">https://forum.bulk-online.com/search...earchid=426828

Attachments

pelletron_picture (JPG)

Re: Selecting Elbows

Posted on 2. Feb. 2008 - 06:38

a good article by all means . we use x bends a double tee bend that can be asily inspected without dismantling the instalation.

Marco

TECMEN Consultant in: Sponge Iron (DRI) handling Sponge Iron DRI Automated Storage Firefighting and Root Cause Analysis Pneumatic Conveying Consultants Phone 5281 8300 4456.

X Bend Photo

Posted on 1. Jul. 2008 - 09:03

an old picture to show what an x bend looks like .

the numbers are wear monitoring points.

Attachments

tee bend026 (JPG)

TECMEN Consultant in: Sponge Iron (DRI) handling Sponge Iron DRI Automated Storage Firefighting and Root Cause Analysis Pneumatic Conveying Consultants Phone 5281 8300 4456.

Re: Selecting Elbows

Posted on 28. Feb. 2010 - 03:35

Hi

Intersting articel

I am a designer which specialize on transport abrasive materials.

The circular elbow does not matter if it's pneumatic transport or hydro transport, an area where there is abrasion on the wall is small and in the same area . with photo

Another problem in different shapes knee is behind the curve classic abrasion and 15-20 cm for the flange joint. And whatever you do what you do, it is still there.

problem is that the material is the concetrate due to centrifugal forces at wall, just a small inequality sealing flange joints and creates intense turbulence.

On the basis of experience, we designet patented and using squaer knee. approximately 10 times greater durability. Furthermore, there is no abrasion behind the knee. When we put the square knee burner boiler efficiency went up by about 0.5%.

It is becose if you gou from square to circle the material is forced to pack up and throw Back to the center line. But find to right dimension cost lot of time :-)

In knee is build measurement system of speed abrasion, so you can monitor it on-line without opening. I am able to predic the life time of systems, and emedietly know if costumer chang materials how it as reflected in the rate of abrasion and hence life.

PS the standard knee telling basalt. A method of unloading the basalt allowed me to put on routes where there is material that a foreign object bolts, nuts, stone, which is the normal landing scopen break, so here it does not matter.

I made a formal economic evaluation of the power station using square arches. Considered the costs associated with dismantling, assembly, repair scaffolding etc. conclusion: Operating expenses decreased to 10-15%

for more info contact me

hydro transport

href="mailto:kohout.vaclav@centrum.cz">kohout.vaclav@centrum.cz

Attachments

hydro transport (JPG)

pneu transport (JPG)

sguer bend (JPG)