Crowned head pulley

Nishant
(not verified)
Posted in: , on 2. Apr. 2007 - 11:47

Dear All,

This is the first time I am posting a thread on this forum and is due to a query that I would like some more information on.

We recently designed several new head pulleys with parallel faces, and have just been asked to look at crowned head pulleys. A fellow engineer has suggested crowning is not a suitable option for the head pulley, and the literature points to potential belt damage due to overstressing.

I would appreciate anyone's thoughts/experiences with regards to crowned head pulleys. I have provided some details of the belt, pulley and material below (hopefully I haven't missed anything critical):

Belt: 650mm PN500/3, with 5mm top cover and 2mm bottom covers, running at 3m/s on 35-degree trough idlers.

Head pulley: 520mm diameter (plus 10mm rubber lagging) steel pulley, 750mm face width.

Material: Coal (approx 40mm average size) to be transferred at 300TPH

I look forward to any comments that anyone may have.

Thanks in advance,

Nishant

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 2. Apr. 2007 - 10:06

Originally posted by Nishant

A fellow engineer has suggested crowning is not a suitable option for the head pulley, and the literature points to potential belt damage due to overstressing.

I had always thought that head pulleys were almost always crowned?

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 4. Apr. 2007 - 09:39

Originally posted by J D

Head Pulleys are not crowned for steel cord belts.

Ah, never been involved with steel cord belts. Learn something new all the time!

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 6. Apr. 2007 - 11:46

It is not advisable to crown any drive drum. Although this does show up more with the steel cord belts, the same theory does still apply to textile belts. As stated earlier, there are different tensions at different areas of the drum. Then, if you imagine that the centre of a crowned drum has a larger circumference than the edge, this [can] lead to a sort of rubbing effect at the edges as the tensions change. This can often be heard and the results most definitely seen (the bottom cover wears heavily at each edge section).

Hope this helps,

Stan Holcroft,

Dunlop Conveyor Belting,

Netherlands.

Nishant
(not verified)

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 10. Apr. 2007 - 03:24

Thank you for the comments.

I checked the other thread regarding crowned pulleys, and it seems to be more focused on steel cord belts. Unless there is a considerable advantage (in terms of cost, improved life of components etc) to using crowned head pulleys, it might make more sense to keep things as they are. However the debate seems to roll on (no pun intended).

Looking at this issue from a different perspective, how would a crowned pulley fare as a comparison to a parallel faced pulley? ie. would it be more costly, longer lead time to manufacture, extra maintenance?

I look forward to any comments that may help with the above.

Thanks

Nishant
(not verified)

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 10. Apr. 2007 - 03:26

Thank you for the comments.

I checked the other thread regarding crowned pulleys, and it seems to be more focused on steel cord belts. Unless there is a considerable advantage (in terms of cost, improved life of components etc) to using crowned head pulleys, it might make more sense to keep things as they are. However the debate seems to roll on (no pun intended).

Looking at this issue from a different perspective, how would a crowned pulley fare as a comparison to a parallel faced pulley? ie. would it be more costly, longer lead time to manufacture, extra maintenance?

I look forward to any comments that may help with the above.

Thanks

Nishant

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 12. Apr. 2007 - 05:24

Hi Nishant

Crowning pulleys is of some value as a training help on fabric belts.

The secret is to crown only the edges of the pulleys, i.e. only 15% of the face width on each side. This is because the training forces in the middle 60% of the face cancel each other out, so its only the edges that do the training anyway.

This also means that additional belt stress due to crowning is reduced by 60%, thus allowing you to crown HT pulleys.

Also, in this way, you loose less shell thickness at the edge.

Try and avoid crowning close adjacent pulleys though, so crown the head, the drive (if not at the head) the take-up and the tail.

Cheers

LSL Tekpro

Graham Spriggs
Nishant
(not verified)

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 13. Apr. 2007 - 09:25

Thanks Graham.

Even after reading through the other forum regarding crown pulleys I have to admit I cannot see how a crowned pulley helps to train the belt?

I'm obviously missing something because to me it seems like a crowned surface would increase belt tracking problems. For example if a belt is mistracking causing it to touch the pulley surface where it is sloped, I would have thought that the extra weight on that side would simply pull the belt further off centre?

I would appreciate if anyone could clear this up, or point me in the direction of any literature that can explain it.

It also seems to me that it would be more expensive to crown a pulley, especially considering some of the small differences in diameters (between the centre of the pulley and the edge) that would require machining to fairly tight tolerances.

In our current project we have specified parallel face pulleys and have since been asked to investigate whether a crowned pulley is a 'better' option.

Hope to hear any comments that anyone might have.

Thankyou

Nishant

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 13. Apr. 2007 - 10:38

My understanding is that the belt naturally tracks to the 'high' point on the pulley. I've seen various references as to how this happens but can't lay my hands on them at the moment.

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 13. Apr. 2007 - 02:43

The crowning effect is that if you have a belt on a cone shaped pulley, the belt has a strong tendancy to climb up the cone towards the major diameter.

This is like when you ride a bike against a shallow curb, and the bike climbs the curb.

If you have two identical cones with one belt over both, then if the belt is in the centre, the clinbing up the cone forces cancel out.

If however, the belt wanders off the centre-line, there will be more belt on one cone and less on the other creating an imbalance in these climbing up the cone forces, and this imbalance force tries to correct the situation by putting the belt back on the centre-line again. Hence training the belt.

Since it is only the difference in these climbing up the pulley forces that does the work, then you only need cones at the ends of the pulley, as, like I said before, the middle common portion climbing up the cone forces cancel themselves out.

Cheers

LSL Tekpro

Graham Spriggs
Nishant
(not verified)

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 16. Apr. 2007 - 11:25

Thanks for the advice, it's starting to make a bit more sense (especially the bike analogy).

I'm trying to get hold of some literature to get a better feel for some of the mathematics behind this occurrence.

Thanks again for all the help!

Nishant

Lagged Pulley

Posted on 3. Oct. 2007 - 08:13

lagged pulleys need not be crowned

ash_bhatnagar
(not verified)

Crowning

Posted on 3. Oct. 2007 - 11:08

Crowning is helpful mostly if the pulley is not lagged. There is very minimal effect of crowning if the pulley is lagged.My view its better to avoid crowning of lagged pulleys.

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 3. Oct. 2007 - 11:15

Sorry Ashwanik...

What you say is simply not true.

I suggest the forum ignore these comments.

LSL Tekpro

Graham Spriggs
ash_bhatnagar
(not verified)

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 4. Oct. 2007 - 06:09

Dear Graham,

I would like to be enlightened further on this.Pl suggest some article/literature on the subject.

I have been involved in designing many of small to very long conveyors including pipe conveyors,and have never used the crowning for lagged pulleys with herringbone groove pattern.Till now there have not been any reported problems.

I still keep my views to avoid the unnecessary cost and time addition to produce crown pulleys without any substantial gains.

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 4. Oct. 2007 - 07:15

In that case Ash, please explain your motivation or theory behind the obviously incorrect statement that:

"There is very minimal effect of crowning if the pulley is lagged"

Crowning relies on friction to make it work. Lagging increases the friction and therefore obviously increases the effect of crowning, as we have found to be the true case in practice.

Please explain to the forum.

Thank you

LSL Tekpro

Graham Spriggs

Rubber Lagging On Crowned Pulley

Posted on 4. Oct. 2007 - 05:48

crowning certainly helps tracking. In case of lagging on pulleys whether crowning is recomended over rubber lagging or on steel face.

A R SINGH

A R SINGH DIRECTOR MODTECH MATERIAL HANDLING PROJECTS PVT LTD PLOT NO.325,SECTOR-24 FARIDABAD,HARYANA, INDIA

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 5. Oct. 2007 - 06:04

Crown pulleys are very limited in the effect of training a belt and are not recommended in more than just steel cord applications. But having said that there is some benefit.

Here is a C&P from CEMA 6th Edition

There are currently four types of pulley crowning available.

Straight Face

Straight face pulleys have no crown and are favored by the belt manufacturers. They are recommended

for all installations using reduced ply, high modulus, low stretch belts, such as those with a carcass of

steel cables or high strength tensile members.

Taper Crown

On taper crown pulleys, the face forms a "V" with the rotating axis larger in diameter in the center of

the pulley. This crown is expressed in inches of crown per foot of total face width, by which the diameter

at the center of the face exceeds the diameter at the edge. Normal crowns of this type vary from 1/16 to

1/8 inch per foot of total face width.

Trapezoidal Crown

Trapezoidal (Trap) crown pulleys have a flat surface in the middle portion of the pulley face with the

ends tapered. Trapezoidal crown pulleys may be appropriate for wider face width pulleys.

Curve Crown

Curve crown pulleys have a long, flat surface in the center of the pulley with the ends curved to a

smaller diameter. Except on short pulleys, the curved surface extends in approximately 8 inches from

the edge.

PULLEY FACE

A crowned face is effective in centering a belt on the pulley if the approach to the pulley is an

unsupported span that is unaffected by the steering action of idlers. Consequently, for troughed belts the

crown on the head pulley of a conveyor is of little value in training the belt. Some benefit may be realized

in terms of centering the belt through a tripper by having a crowned face on the tripper discharge pulley.

Crowned face on low-tension bend pulleys in the return run and on a tail pulley where there is a relatively

long unsupported span between return idler and the pulley may be slightly beneficial in centering the

belt, but the contribution to overall training is minor.

Crowned-face pulleys should never be used for any pulleys on conveyors using steel-cable belt.

Multiple-ply belts should not be used on a crowned-face pulley where the tension will exceed 76

pounds per inch per ply. However, for all belts with textile carcasses, the best recommendation is that

crowned pulleys be limited to locations where the belt will only be subjected to less than 40 percent of

its rated tension.

Only straight-face pulleys should be used for all two-pulley drives and for drive snub pulleys.

Just thought I would through in my 2 cents worth for what it is worth.

Gary Blenkhorn
President - Bulk Handlng Technology Inc.
Email: garyblenkhorn@gmail.com
Linkedin Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gary-blenkhorn-6286954b

Offering Conveyor Design Services, Conveyor Transfer Design Services and SolidWorks Design Services for equipment layouts.

ash_bhatnagar
(not verified)

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 6. Oct. 2007 - 04:09

Gary,

I fully agree with your views and explanations.

Thanks

Conveyor Belt And Other Rubber Belts Hope Cooperation

Posted on 8. Oct. 2007 - 03:11

Dear Mr

We are factory specializing in the manufacture and export of conveyor belt, v-belt, tire and other rubber belt for more than 17 years, having higher quality and lower price.

Our company, which is the biggest and leading company for rubber belt, covers 180,000 square meters and has 1461 well qualified workers and 126 excellent technicians.

Our company has passed ISO9001:2000 quality management system certification, ISO14001:2004environmental management system certification, ISO 10012:2003 metering inspection system certification and so on

We can make conveyor belt according to our customers’ request with different standards, such as ´´DIN 22102´´(German Standard), ´´SANS 1173:2005´´ (South African Standard), ´´BS 490´´ (British Standard), ´´AS 1332-2000´´(Australian Standard), ´´RMA´´ (American Standard) and etc.

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 8. Oct. 2007 - 09:01

Dear all

We made a flat belt feeder a few years ago, where the pulley manufacturer ommitted to crown the pulleys.

As a result, the belt could not be made to track.

All the other belt feeders we have done both flat as well as ones with short wing rolls (and that is a load of them) have edge crowning on both pulleys.

These all track fine, and we are talking serious belt tensions and high class belts.

So pulley crowning works and there is no question about it.

So you must not always believe everything you read in the books, but you should take heed of what has been found to be true in practice.

That is what this excellent forum is for.

Regards

LSL Tekpro

Graham Spriggs
Ray Cowburn - Sandvik, Australia
(not verified)

Some Comments On Crowns...

Posted on 7. Dec. 2007 - 04:42

a few traps for the beginner:

1) the amount of crown (just how much taper to use)?

often crowns are specified as either a radius crown or trapezoidal crown.

if the taper or radius is too steep the drive pulley will have limited contact with the belt - reducing the drive characteristics and increasing cover damage. You need to assess the drive requirement and maybe increase the pulley diameter appropriately - don't try to get away with just tightening the belt more - that's cheating.

on a 600 wide belt the crown should be limited to say between 1:40 to 1:100 slope approx 2mm taper (or 4mm off the diameter) probably as a 1/3-1/3-1/3 trapezoid

if the crown is too shallow (almost flat) you get speed differential effect - typically, the belt is driving at the major diameter speed, the pulley ends at the taper are doing the same RPM but lower peripheral speed - this can cause abrasion on the belt covers and the pulley ends. shallow crown angles have minimal tracking effect.

2) do I crown the shell or just crown the lagging?

my preference is to machine the pulley face flat and crown the lagging. This has some pros and cons:

pro: easier shell machining

con: slightly harder lagging process

pro: it's easy to remove old lagging

con: re-lagging is a pain

it is easiest to machine the steel and then hot vulc over - this gives acceptable tolerance on TIR without grinding

BUT remember this -

when you machine the crown on the pulley steel shell you will remove the material in the location of the end discs - so you need to make sure that the parent shell material has sufficient thickness so the weld won't fail

this is mainly a problem on wider pulleys with larger tapers and should not be too much of a problem with 600mm belt.

Personally - I would not recommend to crown a head pulley,

tail and take ups; yes

head or drive pulley; no

for steel cord belts; never.

Crowning really only controls the tracking locally and masks other installation faults (crooked splice / unsquare structure or idlers). On a short wide belt like a flat feeder crowning can help because the tracking effect of the idlers is minimal and the splice needs to be perfect to make it run true.

The trough idlers will generally centralize the belt well enough and will have far more effect on the belt tracking prior to the head pulley.

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 7. Dec. 2007 - 07:25

Good day Ray

Please explain to the forum why you do not recommend to crown the head and drive pulleys.

Cheers

LSL Tekpro

Graham Spriggs
Ray Cowburn - Sandvik, Australia
(not verified)

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 8. Dec. 2007 - 01:55

Graham,

I guess the problem here is pulleys come in anywhere from 350mm to 3000mm wide and diameters from 250mm up to 1800mm (or larger) with all sorts of different lagging options and similarly, belts from 2 ply light covers to ST6000++ - so making specific statements or speaking generalities probably can't apply to all cases.

In smaller systems like 650mm belt / quarry applications using conservative designs and suitably large diameter drive pulleys the crowning may not result in a significant increase in belt tension (i.e.: not enough to warrant a change in component duty)...in these cases I guess it doesn't matter...

my reasoning for not recommending crowning in the case of head & drive pulleys is described above but to clarify:

1. no crowning on steel cord - it's just not worth voiding the manufacturers warranty - simple.

2. the tracking effect of the preceeding trough idlers generally will be higher than the tracking effect of the crown on a head pulley - an exception could be (say) a tripper where the unloaded belt and associated lift-off could benefit from a crowned pulley.

crowned pulleys are most effective where there is an unsupported length of belt (GTU) or on systems with flat return idlers

you could also throw in bucket elevator drives - but this is the troughed belt conveyor forum and that would be another issue.

3. an effective crown will reduce the drive pulley face to belt contact pressure at the edges of the crown. The increased centre tension is WHY crowning works. When designing a conveyor the demand power is calculated then the required start/run tension requirement is calculated to transmit the power to the belt. The pulley diameter is selected from the belt manufacturers recommended minimum (or greater if required) the pulley lagging friction factor, wrap angle and snubbing - all this is generally modelled to come up with an economic "engineered" solution that determines the duty of the pulleys and associated hardware & structure. This needs to be competitively priced, too (or you might not win the work).

It seems pointless to me to decrease the drive characteristics of the pulley (necessitating increasing the belt tension or spending $$$ on starting / lagging solutions) by crowning the drive pulley just to get a tracking effect that probably is not needed.

these comments may not apply to ALL cases BUT I have not found it necessary to crown a drive pulley to make the system work properly.

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 20. Mar. 2008 - 07:55

As usual Graham is right.

He is right saying crowned pulleys are effective training devices, and he is right advising to crown only towards the edges, leaving the center flat.

Comments about pulley lagging is pointless. It's crowned or not.

And, yes it has to be used with care as it can be dangerous for the belt. Steelcord with elastic cords can be used with crowned pulleys.

To the guy who says it is useless: nothing affecting the drive pulleys on a conveyor is either "useless" or "harmless". Any minor modification on this point have HUGE effects.

As said Graham: these are conveyor basics...

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 23. Mar. 2008 - 03:16

Hi Ray

My 2 bobs worth are:

small width conveyors have little tracking effect from the trough idlers - esp. when empty > so crowned head pulleys have an effect

with trippers =- same applies as above..esp. with lift off curves and empty running and tripper car mis alignments on the travel rails

bucket elevators - def. crown them - both top and bottom

GTU - yes I agree - long run and with GTU, the frame is normally not well guides..get sinusoidal motion of the belt weaving. Also....can get effect from worn lagging on the preceding bend pulley with carry back materials

stacker discharge - head pulleys - non drive..esp. with chevron mode and different material rates/tranjectoris on the tripper car. watch for wear on covers - low cycle times

Cheers

James

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 9. Jan. 2009 - 08:50

We are discussing the issue of crowning of head pulleys here without a proper set of parameters and belt condition involved. Most of the time, when we install belts that are not tracking properly, it rarely is a case that require crowning on the head pulley. Double checking alignment of the tail pulley tensioning, return idlers, contamination etc would normally solve belt sway or misalignment issue.

If all else fails, I suppose the next thing to try before demolishing the conveyor structure (due to poor construction, misalignment, deformed shape etc.) I suppose we can crown the pulley as suggested by Spriggs (flat middle and tipped down on both edges). There is not really a way we can isolate all other factors insitu to realise how effective the crowning will be. IN any case tho, where we have tried crowning the pulley (both the steel drum and the hot lagging with double helical grooves), it seemd to yield positive results. I am refering to belts that are working at EP800, over 400meters in length carrying limestone normally found in cement plants.

On the side note, we have seen little and close to no effect it as on cold and hot splices, but it can be destructive on mechanical fasteners (ie superscrews). This could only mean that crowning does put some uneven stress on the belt.

To our experience, crowning does help belt tracking in most of the jobs we have handle, but then again, there are cases where the crowning of the pulley is not the issue.

It all depends on troubleshooting of the conveyor you are working on and its tracking issue. Adding those new jazzy tracking rollers or SAG idler may not always get the job done either. Personally, I believe the crowning helps simply because 99% of the time, when we had to solve these tracking problems, we would do the crowning on the head pulley and tracking issue will be solved... for at least the next 6months (since in my working environment, belts are not properly maintained and monitored). And perhaps stepping back and crunch some numbers on the conveyor to see if its properly built would help too just because we've ran into many plants who are working their conveyors way above their capacity.

Just from a layman's point of view here.

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 9. Jan. 2009 - 06:49
Quote Originally Posted by Graham SpriggsView Post
The crowning effect is that if you have a belt on a cone shaped pulley, the belt has a strong tendancy to climb up the cone towards the major diameter.

.......................

Cheers

LSL Tekpro

Dear Experts,

I have read that belt will always try to move towards where it can get maximum grip or tension. But pratically I find different.

Please imagine a simple conveyor only with drive & tail pulley with screw take-up.

If I am standing behind the tail pulley and move the tail pulley's left side bearing housing towards drive pulley, I find that belt drifts towards my leftside only, where tension is reduced.

( The endless length is lesser at left side than that of right side )

Belt is following the path where it can run with minimum stress or strain.

Any explanations please!

Re: Crowned Head Pulley

Posted on 12. Jan. 2009 - 10:46

Yes...

The simple explanation is that your pulley on the screw take-up is cylindrical (not Conical)

Cheers

LSL Tekpro

Graham Spriggs