Conveying Problems

Posted in: , on 4. Dec. 2008 - 21:15

Hello,

I am vacuum conveying PVC powder from a mixing plant into a silo and have major problems with material slugging / blocking the pipeline.

Maximum achievable throughput is 400kg per hour with a bulk density of 0.620 approx; moisture is 0.10% approximately.

System specs:

Exhauster: Atlas Copco @ 16kw, 3550RPM.

Horizontal pipe run: 35 metres

Vertical Pipe run: 10 metres

Bends: 5

Pipework: 4" Nom bore SCH10

The air intake velocity is 26.8 m/s with all valves running.

There is a pipework diameter change just before the vertical rise (this is close to the "start" of the system - i.e. where powder enters the conveying line). Before this point the pipework is 4"OD (14SWG).

Measuring the airflow just before the vertical rise - i.e. after the pipework diameter change gives a clean air velocity of 21 m/s approx.

In line filtration (above the silo) area is 12m2 in total; the differential pressure across these is between 10 and 18mbar.

Any feedback at all is appreciated; this problem (and its inconsistency!) is crippling this part of the system.

Any more information needed please ask.

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 4. Dec. 2008 - 09:24

Manoo: It falls through a blowing seal into the pipeline; the air intake is located just behind the blowing seal.


Originally posted by Mantoo

how are you feeding the PVC powder into the system ????

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 4. Dec. 2008 - 10:26

Dear pvcnewbie,

More info is needed.

Particle size of PVC powder

Are you referring to a pressure- or a vacuum system?

What are the inner diameters of the pipeline

At what distance the diameter change is located?

Is the air mover a positive displacement pump or a fan (approx. 12 m3/min)?

What is the air displacement of the compressor?

When conveying 400 kg/hr, what is the conveying pressure or vacuum)?

What is the volume of the rotary seal and the rpm?

Awaiting your reply

all for now

Teus

Teus

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 4. Dec. 2008 - 11:56

Teus: Some info I have to hand; I'll have to dig for the rest:

Powder particle size has a mean of around 250 micron; this peaks at about 800 and has a small tail reaching down to just below 10 micron. Still, the particle size is mainly concentrated in the 250 micron area.

It is a vacuum system using ambient air and a Roots exhauster.

The pipeline inner diam is 4" for all of the conveying line and air after the receiving vessel. The pipeline before the diameter change is 4"OD * 14SWG - I'm not sure what this makes the internal diameter though (will check).

Pipe diameter change occurs at approx 11.5 metres after 2 bends, immediately followed by vertical.

Pressure when read from the exhauster when conveying the low rate of material is approximately -0.4 bar.

Rotary seal (between the receiving vessel and the silo top) is approx 28RPM and valve size is 250 (not sure what this makes the volume - can find out).

I will dig for remaining info and feed back.


Originally posted by Teus Tuinenburg

Dear pvcnewbie,

More info is needed.

Particle size of PVC powder

Are you referring to a pressure- or a vacuum system?

What are the inner diameters of the pipeline

At what distance the diameter change is located?

Is the air mover a positive displacement pump or a fan (approx. 12 m3/min)?

What is the air displacement of the compressor?

When conveying 400 kg/hr, what is the conveying pressure or vacuum)?

What is the volume of the rotary seal and the rpm?

Awaiting your reply

all for now

Teus

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 02:29

Dear newbie,

The PVC powder should have a suspension velocity of approx. 2.5 m/sec

This requires an intake velocity of approx. 10 m/sec

For a 4” pipe this corresponds with a blower displacement of approx. 0.125 m3/sec at 0.4 bar vacuum

According your information, the velocity is approx 21 m/sec with clean air, resulting in a blower displacement of approx. 0.155 m3/sec

Using your information, I calculate a solid friction factor for 400 kg at 0.4 bar vacuum, which is approx. 10^6 times higher than for other installations with a comparable material.

Also the exhauster data seem to be not in accordance.

I could not find a Roots blower in the gamma of Atlas Copco and the power of 16 kW also seems too high for a Roots blower of only 0.155 m3/sec at 0.4 bar vacuum.

I suggest that you check your data again and if they are correct, you should check your installation for defects or even blockages.

What is meant by “all valves running”?

I am interested

Teus

Teus

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 03:26

Hi guys,

Atlas recently bought up a Czech PD blower mfg so it is possible that this is a PD blower package. But they also make dry screws and turbos. Can you find out the model number and RPM of the blower?

How new is this system and has it ever worked differently for the worse or better?

Teus is correct in saying that 16 Kw is bit much power consumption wise. For the two volumina this should be more like 7.5 - 10 KW.

Regards, Ralf Weiser (001)-484-718-3518 [url]www.aerzenusa.com[/url]

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 04:08

Tues / Ralf,

Thankyou for your responses. By "all valves running" I mean the rotary lock at the end of the powder convey (i.e. into the silo) and also the blowing seal at the start of the convey line (powder entry point).

The rotary lock volume is 11.26 litres / rev. It is running at 28RPM.

The blower nameplate information states that it is a ZL1200, input power 16.5KW, rot shaft speed 3880 RPM (although we have documentation suggesting it is set to run at 3550RPM).

As an observation through a stretch of horizontal flexible pipe near the start of the system, much of the powder appears to sit at the bottom of the pipeline and is not suspended in air.

If there are any more queries please ask and I will attempt to find the information.


Originally posted by Teus Tuinenburg

Dear newbie,

The PVC powder should have a suspension velocity of approx. 2.5 m/sec

This requires an intake velocity of approx. 10 m/sec

For a 4” pipe this corresponds with a blower displacement of approx. 0.125 m3/sec at 0.4 bar vacuum

According your information, the velocity is approx 21 m/sec with clean air, resulting in a blower displacement of approx. 0.155 m3/sec

Using your information, I calculate a solid friction factor for 400 kg at 0.4 bar vacuum, which is approx. 10^6 times higher than for other installations with a comparable material.

Also the exhauster data seem to be not in accordance.

I could not find a Roots blower in the gamma of Atlas Copco and the power of 16 kW also seems too high for a Roots blower of only 0.155 m3/sec at 0.4 bar vacuum.

I suggest that you check your data again and if they are correct, you should check your installation for defects or even blockages.

What is meant by “all valves running”?

I am interested

Teus

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 04:11

Ralf,

In answer to one of your queries, the system is decreasing in performance. To make matters more complicated, poor conveying performance is not consistant; sometimes 400kg/hour appears to be the maximum we can transfer, sometimes 1500kg/hour.

It has been suggested that figures up to 4000kg / hour should be possible with this system?


Originally posted by RalfWeiser

Hi guys,

Atlas recently bought up a Czech PD blower mfg so it is possible that this is a PD blower package. But they also make dry screws and turbos. Can you find out the model number and RPM of the blower?

How new is this system and has it ever worked differently for the worse or better?

Teus is correct in saying that 16 Kw is bit much power consumption wise. For the two volumina this should be more like 7.5 - 10 KW.

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 04:47

Dear newbie, hi Ralf

We are getting closer to the solution, I think.

First of all.

The compressor ZL1200 might be a blower mentioned by Ralf.

I could not trace it back on the website of Atlas Copco.

It might be a 1200m3/hr blower (# 20 m3/min)

If so, this could explain the 16 kW.

But, then the design velocities are far too high and should be re-evaluated.

Nevertheless the system should work properly, although with a far too high energy consumption and possible damage to the pvc powder.

My original calculation of your system , using a comparable product loss factor to previous installations, told me a capacity of approx 5 tons/hr

The same magnitude as your mentioned 4000 kg/hr.

It now looks like, that the rotary lock at the end of the conveying installation is leaking far too much air.

Not enough air is then left for the conveying system and sedimentation starts in the beginning of the pipeline as the air velocities are the lowest there.

Two things to check.

Blower data in m3/min and pressure.

Rotary lock condition at receiving hopper.

Let us know

Teus

Teus

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 04:57

Hi pvcnewbie,

Regards, Ralf Weiser (001)-484-718-3518 [url]www.aerzenusa.com[/url]

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 05:09

Hi pvcnewbie,

All I can say is that your blower provides 14.5 to 15.7m3/min inlet air flow at 400mBar vacuum at the two blower speeds you mentioned. It is a DN100 / 4" discharge blower package so that matches the overall picture. That flow is much more that Teus calculated you need. Now comes the parts any of the bulkaholic experts aggree on: This is only a problem if the system was not designed for this condition or the material. Or is it a maintenance item after all?

I would go on by reviewing your conveying history and trend your material consistency along the way with it. If this turns up nothing you will have to bite the bullet and painstakenly record all operating conditions and the system layout as well as the material make up. Did you contact your system OEM? That would be my first trip in asking for their assistance in solving this issue.

If all else fails make good use of this forum to ask for free or paid consultancy in trying to figure out how you can alliviate the issue (or better issues). There are usually always multiple issues culminating into a bigger problem. Perhaps you can figure it out all by yourself.

Just make sure your research captures accurate operating conditions. The old adage of garbage-in-garbage-out will otherwise bite you badly.

Regards, Ralf Weiser (001)-484-718-3518 [url]www.aerzenusa.com[/url]

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 05:16

Hi pvcnewbie,

I just remembered a post a while ago where someone had terrible plugs in a 4" line and they dicovered it had not been the system but ambient air and mositure had gotten through rubber pipe coupling and flanges which cause material build up in the ppes around those areas inside the pipe thereby causing the plugs. Did you ever look at the cleanliness of your pipes?

Regards, Ralf Weiser (001)-484-718-3518 [url]www.aerzenusa.com[/url]

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 06:00

Hi newbie, hi Ralf,

I calculated the system now as built, with an Aerzen blower type GM 15L

Look at the pdf file attached.

Note the very high velocities etc.

Enjoy it

Teus

Attachments

newbie (PDF)

Teus

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 06:25

Hi Teus,

Cool. The high velocity causes higher than necessary system power consumption, but does this cause the plugs?

Regards, Ralf Weiser (001)-484-718-3518 [url]www.aerzenusa.com[/url]

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 06:36

Hi Ralf,

I don't think so.

Due to the high velocities, the particles are moving far apart from each other and the loading ratio is not high (8.9).

Certainly not when the conveying rate is only 400 kg/hr.

That is why I think that there is conveying air leaking thruogh the airlock, causing too low velocities in the pipe line, resulting in sedimentation.

If my suspicion is correct, then the airlock must be in a terrible condition.

We will hear

Are you happy with your new president?

We expect a lot from him.

take care

Teus

Teus

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 06:40

Hi teus,

Regards, Ralf Weiser (001)-484-718-3518 [url]www.aerzenusa.com[/url]

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 06:50

Hi Teus,

Sorry I pushed the send button too early again. A bad airlock would coincide with the system having gotten progressively worse.

I am ecited about having a new president. I am proud of the democratic system having worked as well as showing that anything is possible in the USA.

Regards, Ralf Weiser (001)-484-718-3518 [url]www.aerzenusa.com[/url]

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 07:48

Teus,

When we increase the speed of the blowing seal at the start of the conveying line (dosing powder into the line) the slugging is terrible.

Is this a function of rotary lock wear or potentially because the air velocity is too high?


Originally posted by Teus Tuinenburg

Hi Ralf,

I don't think so.

Due to the high velocities, the particles are moving far apart from each other and the loading ratio is not high (8.9).

Certainly not when the conveying rate is only 400 kg/hr.

That is why I think that there is conveying air leaking thruogh the airlock, causing too low velocities in the pipe line, resulting in sedimentation.

If my suspicion is correct, then the airlock must be in a terrible condition.

We will hear

Are you happy with your new president?

We expect a lot from him.

take care

Teus

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 08:01

So you could be causing the slugs by loading the line with too much product? Perhaps I am misunderstanding the blowing seal you are talking about. What does that look like or which mfg is it?

Regards, Ralf Weiser (001)-484-718-3518 [url]www.aerzenusa.com[/url]

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 08:04

Dear newbie,

Increasing the rpm of the blowing seal increases the material feed and thereby the SLR.

SLR = Solid loading ratio

If the SLR becomes too high, then the pressure drop also increases.

The vacuum on the blower increases also and as a result the blower displaces less air mass flow.

Then the air velocity at the beginning of the pipeline drops and can become too low.

Sedimentation is evident and eventually clogging.

As your installation performs worse and worse by time, there is something in your installation that is changing.

The first item, I think off is the rotary lock at the end of the pipeline underneath the filter.

If that rotary lock leaks too much air, the air mass flow along the pipeline becomes less.

This effect is increasing with the vacuum.

In that case, it is still possible to convey low rates at low vacuums, because then the airflow through the pipeline is still just enough.

That is why I asked you to inspect that rotary valve at the end for proper condition.

Additionally, it can be, that your filter is broken and that dust destroyed your blower clearance.

The internal blower leakage reduces the volumetric efficiency of the blower with the same effect.

Check your installation first.

success

Teus

Teus

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 08:59

Ralf,

It is important to note that our "target" is 2660kg/hour.

The material enters the conveying line by dropping through a rotary valve into the air stream.

This rotary valve at the entrance point (which I am calling a blowing seal but could be wrong) is driven by an inverter. As the operator cannot convey at the target speed (or anywhere near) he reduces the RPM of this valve to avoid entirely clogging the pipeline.

The material flows when approximately 400kg/hour is dosed via the valve (i.e. a low inverter setting); above this and quite severe slugging leading to entire pipe blockage is seen.


Originally posted by RalfWeiser

So you could be causing the slugs by loading the line with too much product? Perhaps I am misunderstanding the blowing seal you are talking about. What does that look like or which mfg is it?

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 09:05

Teus,

It is worth noting that there are four silos to convey material into - lengths given previously refer to the furthest one. All silos use the same exhauster.

The "best" conveying silo achieves 1520kg per hour; this is the closest to the plant .

Two of the silos fill at around 400kg per hour each. One confusing fact is that this is not consistent; occasionally it is possible to reach a throughput of 1500kg for many hours at a time into one of them (this makes me more confused).

Of course ideally all silos would fill at a constant rate of 2660kg/hour with the existing pipeline and exhauster.


Originally posted by Teus Tuinenburg

Dear newbie,

Increasing the rpm of the blowing seal increases the material feed and thereby the SLR.

SLR = Solid loading ratio

If the SLR becomes too high, then the pressure drop also increases.

The vacuum on the blower increases also and as a result the blower displaces less air mass flow.

Then the air velocity at the beginning of the pipeline drops and can become too low.

Sedimentation is evident and eventually clogging.

As your installation performs worse and worse by time, there is something in your installation that is changing.

The first item, I think off is the rotary lock at the end of the pipeline underneath the filter.

If that rotary lock leaks too much air, the air mass flow along the pipeline becomes less.

This effect is increasing with the vacuum.

In that case, it is still possible to convey low rates at low vacuums, because then the airflow through the pipeline is still just enough.

That is why I asked you to inspect that rotary valve at the end for proper condition.

Additionally, it can be, that your filter is broken and that dust destroyed your blower clearance.

The internal blower leakage reduces the volumetric efficiency of the blower with the same effect.

Check your installation first.

success

Teus

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 09:26

Dear newbie,

Does it mean that there are 4 rotary locks paralel (4 silos) or are the silos under vacuum whe being filled?

In case there are 4 rotary locks in the system and when one is working, the others should be isolated from the system.

Otherwise the not used rotary locks would still contribute to the leakage,

The varying performance couls be caused by the feeding through the blowing valve.

Suppose the following.

Increasing the rpm of the blowing valve from zero upwards works fine.

You can reach 1500 kg/hr. (at approx 0.25 bar vacuum, see screen shots))

At this pressure the sedimentation is not hampering the performance.

Now you want to try a bit more.

Suddenly the increasing vacuum results in sedimentation, whereby the pipeline gets clogged.

The only way to start again at 1500 kg/hr is purging the pipeline and increase the feeding from zero up.

Still advising to check your system.

Take care

Teus

Teus

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 09:34

Oh my. That detail would have been really important to know up front. I am assuming this involves diverter valves? This means you have 4 airlocks? Do you have a flow schematic of the complete system?

Regards, Ralf Weiser (001)-484-718-3518 [url]www.aerzenusa.com[/url]

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 10:26

Ralf,

I don't have a schematic here, but follows a description of the system:

Material enters a single pipeline via a rotary valve; travels 11.5 metres approx around 2 bends, horizontal pipe.

A short section of flexible pipe allows the operator to connect this pipe to one of four pipelines; each of these runs to a seperate silo - all located next to each other.

After the silos the clean air pipe runs for some time before entering an "automatic change point" which uses butterfly valves to close the relevant pipelines enabling one single route from exhauster to plant.

So basically the entire pipe length is independant with no valves etc until we are back to "clean air" pipeline back to the exhauster.

Hope this makes it a little clearer.


Originally posted by RalfWeiser

Oh my. That detail would have been really important to know up front. I am assuming this involves diverter valves? This means you have 4 airlocks? Do you have a flow schematic of the complete system?

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 5. Dec. 2008 - 10:30

Teus,

Please see my previous comment; reply to Ralph.

Basically the pipelines are independant except for a manual connection point near the start (i.e. one plant connects to any of four pipelines).

This means the other silos are not under any kind of vacuum during the conveying.

The four pipes join a single pipe close to the exhauster, the three pipelines not in use are closed automatically with butterfly valves.


Originally posted by Teus Tuinenburg

Dear newbie,

Does it mean that there are 4 rotary locks paralel (4 silos) or are the silos under vacuum whe being filled?

In case there are 4 rotary locks in the system and when one is working, the others should be isolated from the system.

Otherwise the not used rotary locks would still contribute to the leakage,

The varying performance couls be caused by the feeding through the blowing valve.

Suppose the following.

Increasing the rpm of the blowing valve from zero upwards works fine.

You can reach 1500 kg/hr. (at approx 0.25 bar vacuum, see screen shots))

At this pressure the sedimentation is not hampering the performance.

Now you want to try a bit more.

Suddenly the increasing vacuum results in sedimentation, whereby the pipeline gets clogged.

The only way to start again at 1500 kg/hr is purging the pipeline and increase the feeding from zero up.

Still advising to check your system.

Take care

Teus

Re: Conveying Problems

Posted on 6. Dec. 2008 - 10:01

Dear newbie,

Your additional information underlines the advise to go to the installation and check everything.

If you compare (and if possible calculate) the performance of the 4 pipelines, then you get insight of the differences.

If the found differences cannot be explained theoretically, you have to start further investigation in the installation.

I am sure that there is a lot of information, hidden in the installations operating parameters.

It only needs to be evaluated.

Apart from the 4 rotary locks, you now have also to check the functioning of 4 butterfly valves.

Success

Teus

Teus

Hi

Posted on 7. Dec. 2008 - 12:38

Hi Teus

Great Salutation

After long time it comes to have the interction with you.

well what makes me to come on conclusion is the filter . As spelled by our first threader , he is using filter with the problemistic situation that ie Pressure drop across the filetr. In my view it could be quite abvious to accept that if there is some filter of specific area , would create some delta P . Problem been outlined is very simple, and requires some considerable concern over the filtaeration area, i mean could have possible that filter may get chocked

As if something i would make as a qualified guess, is the filteration problem.

Perhabs it is been experienced due to couple of the reason

1) As enlightened above

2) User should check the design parameter of pipeline layout.Lets be a more specific that Compressor has nothing to make any cause as is not being effected by any factor. What males the problem to be happen is something related to pipeline design

Indeed the problem is require steep attention but could be taken care

Cheers

All for now.....................

Rahul Chuabey

kj