Replies
Design / Properties
Posted on
27. Feb. 2006 - 09:15
It is correct to say that dense-phase design is influenced by product properties, Geldart classification is a good starting point.
More practical information might be obtained by requesting historical data from global suppliers of dense-phase systems, specifically, the type of system sold for the product handled.
Good luck!
Dennis Hauch, PE ■
Re: Dense Phase Pneumatic Conveying - System Comparison
Posted on
28. Feb. 2006 - 04:14
I have a nice PDF literature. Give me your Email. ■
ShenjieTel:+86(0)20 83553890,83550361Fax: +86(0)20 83542314[email]sj@chinabulk.com[/email][url=http://www.chinabulk.com]Sino-Auto Technology[/url]
Re: Dense Phase Pneumatic Conveying - System Comparison
Posted on
28. Feb. 2006 - 05:46
I would be very interested in the PDF Literature that you have. My Email is d.trask@graphitetechnologygroup.com ■
DENSE phase pneumatic conveying - System comparison
Dear collegues,
since 2 years I am involved in dense phase pneumatic conveying (not full time, though).
But I am still confused about the pro's and con's of the systems on the market:
1.) There are sending vessels with bottom and with top outlet.
2.) There are systems without vessel but using a high pressure rotary valve to feed the product.
3.) Some vessel systems empty the conveying line at the end of a cycle, other do not.
4.) Some need boosters every 1.5 m (5 ft) others convey 400 m without any secondary air.
I am sure that DIFFERENT PRODUCT PROPERTIES resulted in the variation of technical solution.
So my question is:
Is there any open literature providing an overview of the different system and RELATING THEM TO PRODUCT PROPERTIES ?
Thanks to all answers. ■