Weight from storage hopper on feeder

Harm
(not verified)
Posted in: , on 22. Mar. 2005 - 17:40

Dear All,

To calculate the stiffness of the springs of a vibrating feeder, the mass of the trough and the material has to be determined.

The totall mass is the mass of the trough, the mass of the material in the trough and the mass of de material from the storage hopper.

How can i determine the mass from the storage hopper that presses on the vibrating feeder??? The Storage hopper itself does not pres on the conveyor, but is mounted on an other frame.

regards,

Harm van der Pol

Student Fontys High School Eindhoven (Holland)

Attachments

problemstoragehopperJPEG:forum_attachments/file_container/problemstoragehopper.jpg (BMP)

Re: Weight From Storage Hopper On Feeder

Erstellt am 22. Mar. 2005 - 05:23

Mr. van der Pol

The simplest way to determine the load on the feeder is to calculate the area of the discharge opening exposed to the feeder multiplied by the vertical height of the material directly over the feeder. Then calculate the total weight by multiplying this answer by the bulk density of the material.

Hope this helps

Gary Blenkhorn

Gary Blenkhorn
President - Bulk Handlng Technology Inc.
Email: garyblenkhorn@gmail.com
Linkedin Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gary-blenkhorn-6286954b

Offering Conveyor Design Services, Conveyor Transfer Design Services and SolidWorks Design Services for equipment layouts.

Re: Weight From Storage Hopper On Feeder

Erstellt am 22. Mar. 2005 - 07:50

Gary,

Are you sure about that?

What you describe indicates stored bulk material behaves 'hydrostatically'. Most information I have indicates that the download initially increases with depth but then tails off to a constant value, this value being a function of opening size, bin flank angles and material properties.

Re: Weight From Storage Hopper On Feeder

Erstellt am 22. Mar. 2005 - 08:01

Designer

There is probably a more complicated formula as you mention.

I am more of a "worst case senairio" type of guy and that is why I said the simplest way.

Hope I didn't mislead anyone.

Gary

Gary Blenkhorn
President - Bulk Handlng Technology Inc.
Email: garyblenkhorn@gmail.com
Linkedin Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/gary-blenkhorn-6286954b

Offering Conveyor Design Services, Conveyor Transfer Design Services and SolidWorks Design Services for equipment layouts.

Harm
(not verified)

Untitled

Erstellt am 23. Mar. 2005 - 08:01

thanks for your answers,

I think i use the worst scenario

regards,

Harm van der Pol

Re: Weight From Storage Hopper On Feeder

Erstellt am 29. Apr. 2005 - 10:58

Dear Harm,

Selecting the worst case will result in such high spring stiffness that the feeder will consume more power to overcome the spring stiffness than to impart energy to render the material airborne.

This way it will become totally inefficient.

The static moment will cover the weight of trough and the mechanism and addl. load due to spring stiffness and some material that can become resident on the trough.

Think about it

Thanks

B. J. Jacob Chennai
Harm
(not verified)

Spring Stifness

Erstellt am 29. Apr. 2005 - 01:05

Dear B. J. Jacob,

I agree with that

But how can i determine the spring stiffness when I use fiberglass leafsprings?

If i would drive the system with the same frequency as the natural frequency of the system, it will also result in a verry high spring stiffness i think.

System:

mass of trough incl. transport material = 250 kg.

frequency = 20 Hz.

Amplitude = 5mm (stroke = 10mm).

The systems needs to frequent start/stop.

Should it be a motor with unbalance weights or could i use a elektro motor with positive crank arm?

regards,

Harm van der Pol

Student Fontys University Eindhoven (Holland)

Untitled

Erstellt am 30. Apr. 2005 - 06:21

Dear Harm,

you have indicated 2s=10mm and 20 hertz.

I think electromagnetic drive can deliver such frequency but I dont think your Trough will be able to withstand such high amplitude!!!

I am unable to give you a methord to determine the stiffness of fiber springs but there is a manufacturer Ereiz Magnetics who use a lot of fiber reinforced springs. you can try to contact them for determining the spring stiffness.

But for such high amplitude it is better to use a unbalance weight fitted motor and directly relate the static moment to the weight and amplitude.

the speed of the motor may be limited to 750 RPM (Remember as the frequency go up the amplitude has to be lowered)

Tell us what did you finally use and how did it work

B. J. Jacob Chennai
DirkS - Schenck Africa, RSA
(not verified)

Feeder Head Load

Erstellt am 5. May. 2005 - 10:13

Greetings Harm

I agree that assuming the head load to be hydrostatic will pose problems for the operation of the feeder, especially when applying leaf springs.

The constant value referred to by Designer results from the effect we call "bridging" of the particles above a certain height.

We use a relatively simple approximation of the head load, explained in the attachment.

If you need further info, please contact me, or view our site at www.schenck.co.za.

Best wishes and good luck

Attachments

feeder head load (ZIP)

Harm
(not verified)

Re: Weight From Storage Hopper On Feeder

Erstellt am 5. May. 2005 - 10:41

Thank you for your reply.

It is realy simple, but helpfull!.

Can you also tell me something about the springs?

regards Harm van der Pol

DirkS - Schenck Africa, RSA
(not verified)

Leaf Springs

Erstellt am 5. May. 2005 - 11:27

Hi again Harm

Unfortunately my experience of leaf spring applications is limited to high frequency (50Hz) and small stroke (2s=1.6mm). I have not come accross your requirements before, but here are my thoughts on it:

The combination of 10mm stroke and 20Hz frequency will result in G-forces of about 8G (8 x earth's gravitational force). I agree with Gary that your feeder pan may not be able to withstand these forces.

Further, the use of unbalanced vibrator motors may limit the requirement of frequent starts and stops, and will also not furnish an instantaneous stoppage when power is cut, limiting accuracy of feed batches (assuming that this is what you want to achieve).

The most common electromagnetic drive is a resonance application of a two-mass system which means that the vibrations imposed on the first mass (connected to the structure via coil springs or rubber buffers) at a frequency very close to the natural frequency of the system, induces through natural frequency resonance, a secondary vibration into the second mass which is connected to the first mass via leaf springs or some other type of spring. The combination of stiffness and mass of the two-mass system results in the natural frequency, and in general, the stiffer the spring between the two masses, the higher the natural frequency.

Thus, as leaf springs are added between the two masses, the natural frequency increases and the primary vibration frequency must be increased to "catch up" with the higher natural frequency to achieve resonance. This is a very complicated business, but lacking a method of determining what the stiffness of the springs are (maybe somebody can help here?!) it may be necessary to build the feeder with a "base quantity" of leaf springs, and adding ore removing springs to "tune" the feeder when testing it. The addition of springs can be done by simply sandwiching spacer plates between the leaf springs (spacers must not be the same length as the leaf springs, but only serve to seperate the leafs at their connection points).

Bear in mind that with an ampluitude which you are aiming for, the spacers must be thick enough to still separate the springs when they are bent to their maximum deflection. Also bear in mind that if a spring is added to one side of the feeder, it must be mirrored on the other side to ensure that the total stiffness of the spring systems on both sides is symmetrical alon the longitudinal axis of the pan.

One could actually write a thesis about the subject, and I believe someone has done that, but I hope this helps to make things at least as clear as mud!

Good luck!

Harm
(not verified)

Re: Weight From Storage Hopper On Feeder

Erstellt am 5. May. 2005 - 11:58

Dear Dirk,

from experience I know manufactures as Key Technologies and KMG Systems creating vibrating conveyors with frequencys of 25Hz and amplitudes of 3-4mm.

Sow maybe i would work with 20 Hz and stroke=10mm

but thanks for your reply

regards Harm