Fire Risk with Oil-cooled tramp metal electromagnets

Posted in: , on 7. Dec. 2007 - 18:05

I have a question about the use of tramp iron magnets suspended above coal conveyor belts.

Is there a particular risk involved in using an oil-cooled electromagnet above a raw coal belt? The cooling oil is flammable and the fear is that a leak could result in a fire on the belt.

How real is the threat of fire from an electromagnet?

They are a lot cheaper than solid state magnets.

Also I've heard that you can get air-cooled electromagnets, any experience of these?

The coal is brought to site in trucks and fed to a crusher and pulveriser for use as fuel.

Any advice would be appreciated

N. Smart

Re: Fire Risk With Oil-Cooled Tramp Metal Electromagnets

Posted on 16. Dec. 2007 - 07:19

Hi,

If the magnet is properly rated for this application then there should not be a real hazard. Tha rea above the belt in a coal conveyor would have to be a Zone 20 application - that is that flammable dust would be present in combustible quantities on a regular basis. All electrical equipment for this area would have to conform to ATEX or IEC standards for the zoning. The old Class 1 Zone 1 type equipment would be the type used.

If the magnet is not suitably rated then it would present a hazard.

Tony Vierboom Nova Protection Systems

Re: Fire Risk With Oil-Cooled Tramp Metal Electromagnets

Posted on 16. Dec. 2007 - 11:01

Originally posted by Tony Vierboom

Tha rea above the belt in a coal conveyor would have to be a Zone 20 application - that is that flammable dust would be present in combustible quantities on a regular basis.

BS EN 1127-1 6.3.3 Zones for dusts.

Zone 20

"A place in which an explosive atmosphere in the form of a cloud of combustible dust in air is present continuously, or for long periods or frequently"

How many belt conveyors have you actually seen with an explosive concentration of dust hanging over them?

I NEVER have!!

How many measurements of dust concentrations around belt conveyors, even at transfer points have you made?

I have taken measurements, and they were WELL BELOW the explosive concentration!

Perhaps others would like to add the observations that they have seen, and measurements they have taken.

Re: Fire Risk With Oil-Cooled Tramp Metal Electromagnets

Posted on 18. Dec. 2007 - 06:37

Measurements aside: I have been in meetings where the same Contractor has assured me that a downspout from a sampling point, taking coal to the ground level carousel 30 m below, was not an explosion risk whereas the discharge from the end of the bucket wheel boom constituted an explosive area. I mean!

Just nod & sleep when the boffins get going; its all we can do.

Much of this legislative garbage is rooted in 'security' along the lines of those charming people at the airports. The world was a much safer place until they came along. It was!! Pit Deputies blasted (no pun) anything that was remotely unsafe etc etc.

Giving capitalism free reign has necessitated the safety legislation that was previously automatically available & thus spawned a job creation scheme for the otherwise unemployables.

I wonder if all the lubricants & hydraulic fluids on the delivery trucks are non-flammable.

John Gateley johngateley@hotmail.com www.the-credible-bulk.com