The Black Art of Belt Weighing

Author
(not verified)
Posted in: , on 10. Jul. 2006 - 16:14

The Black Art of Belt Weighing

by

Jon Scarrott. MCGIA Ceng MITE

Managing Director

Lodestone Electronics Ltd.

U.K.

There is a common fallacy that you need to have studied the Dark Arts to be able to install and calibrate a belt weigher. I hope that this article will dispel some of the myths.

The fact is that a belt weigher follows the same physics as a road weigh bridge or shop scale with a few extra complications. The difference is that there are more forces acting on the weigh bridge of a belt weigher than on a platform weigher. These forces need to be understood and reduced to a minimum. Good application engineering is critical. There is a requirement to understand what forces are occurring on a conveyor system and how this will affect the accuracy and long term repeatability of a belt weigher installation.

The Function of the Electronics

A belt weigher is an integrating device, similar to a speedometer in a car, which integrates (multiplies) distance with time. The speed of the belt, (technically the belt displacement) is multiplied by the weight of material on the belt thus giving weight per unit time. In Europe, this is commonly termed as tonnes per hour and totalised tonnes. The problem with this type of measuring technique is that only a small proportion of the total load is passing over the weighing area at any point in time. This means that any error in the calibration of the weighing equipment is accumulated and can appear as a large error in the final total.

Cost of ownership

The writer has been involved in belt weighing with four different companies since the seventies, and has gleaned that part of the myth of belt weighing has been perpetuated by belt weigher suppliers who run a service department and wish to keep their technicians employed. The majority of belt weigher problems can be solved over the phone, thus saving the end user a considerable amount of money in service visits.

Idler Alignment

Attention to detail in the area of the weigh bridge mechanics is fundamental to good belt weighing. Ideally there should be two lead in and two lead out idler sets which become part of the weigh platform. These should be raised above the normal belt line by a minimum of 10mm along with the weigh idler(s). String lines preferably two per idler set should be used to align all of the idlers within 0.5mm of each other. The idler sets should also be square to the belt. In critical applications the idlers should be machined and balanced so that the TIR is within 0.5mm.

Conveyor Design

The conveyor in the area of the belt weigher should be rigid. There is no way round this word. Any flexing of the conveyor structure in the area of the belt weigher will cause errors. Ideally the weigher should be placed on a horizontal section of the conveyor with multiple support points. This of course is usually not practical, so the conveyor has to be carefully surveyed and the best compromise found for the weigher position.

Belt Tension Versus Material Down Load

The greatest conflict with any belt weigher is the down load pressure versus the belt tension. The more the belt is tensioned, the less the apparent material download on the weigh section. Changes in tension can be caused by many events the commonest being by changing amounts of material on the belt, multiple feed points, or more commonly with a screw-tensioned belt. The tensioners are use to track and tension the belt. The resultant change in tension can cause weighing errors. When the screw tensioners have been adjusted, the weigher should be re-calibrated.

Weigh length determination

In order to determine the required weigh length for accurate weighing, t1 and t2 need to be determined. This can sometimes be supplied by the conveyor manufacture or can be calculated. For very high accuracy and critical weighing applications, the following data needs to be determined in order to engineer the application correctly:

Maximum tonnes per hour

Maximum belt speed

Belt width

Idler roll diameter

Conveyor centres

Height of conveyor

Angle of drive wrap

Gravity or screw tension

Bare or lagged drum

Height between feed and discharge points (work done)

Material bulk density

Idler troughing angle

Material surcharge angle

GTU mass

Motor size

Conveyor angle

The tension in the conveyor belt caused by the material weight and the motor torque can now be calculated. Whichever value of tension is greater, is then used to calculate the required weigh length to give an accuracy of either 1.0%, 0.5% and 0.25% over a period of 6 months or 12 months.

GTU

Ideally a conveyor belt should be tensioned with a Gravity Tension Unit. This has many advantages both in conveyor belt life and for a belt weighing system as the belt tension is kept relatively constant.

Belt Troughing

The ideal belt for weighing is flat. The deeper the troughing angle of a belt, the greater its’ mechanical stiffness. A simple example of this is if you try to hold a sheet of paper horizontally, it will flop. If you fold up the edges it will tend to stay horizontal and in the extreme, if you put a crease along the length of the paper in the centre, it will become surprisingly rigid. The same applies to a conveyor belt. The deeper the trough the greater rigidity. To determine how much this will affect the weighing, the volumetric utilisation of the conveyor needs to be calculated. In other words how much material will be passing over the weigher at any point in time. From this information, the range of material flow can be assessed that is required for accurate weighing. This figure is expressed in a percentage of the maximum flow of material. So if a user requires an accuracy of ±0.5%, then the supplier may need to state that this is achievable between 50 and 100% of maximum flow rate. Below this figure, the system will probably become non-linear and unpredictable. However if a constant flow rate can be maintained at a lower flow rate, the belt weigher can be calibrated at this point and will usually maintain its accuracy. If the flow rate changes, then errors could result.

Belt Tracking

It is hard to assess the change in accuracy that a poorly tracked belt causes. This is probably because the material tends to run in the same place relative to the idlers but on a different place on the belt. The main problem appears to be that there are additional pressures on the wing idlers which can cause errors. However, if the mechanical alignment has been carried out correctly, then the problem can be minimised. It has been observed in some applications that tracking idlers can cause a bigger problem than poor belt tracking. We always recommend that the root cause of poor tracking should be found and resolved.

Seasonal Changes

Probably one of the commonest sources of error in a belt weighing system is the changing size of a conveyor due to temperature changes. In more moderate climes such as the UK this is not always so noticeable but in extremes such as the Arctic Circle where the change can be seen over one tea break. In this case it is due to the stiffening of the belt rather than the metalwork changing shape, but temperature does have a very significant affect on weighing accuracy. To reduce these effects the belt zero needs to be performed when the belt is up to its working temperature. This simply involves allowing the conveyor to run for a period before performing a belt zero. The zero should performed as often as necessary. If the conveyor is run empty, the rate value (tonnes per hour) can be observed. It should be changing and moving negatively and positively depending on which part of the belt is currently moving over the weigh area. If the value remains high in either direction then a belt zero is required. It should be checked at least once a day.

Why have Multi-Idler weighers

In order to get high accuracy and repeatable weighing from a belt weigher, a multi-idler weighing system may be required. A multi-idler weigh carriage increases the resident time of material in the weigh area, so the longer you get to measure the material the more likely you are to get it right. This can be particularly critical with high belt speeds and low throughputs, and in the case of applications such as waste disposal, low throughputs, very low bulk densities and wide belts, sometimes with deep troughs. Low throughput systems are always more difficult to engineer than say a 4000t/hr application.

What you can get away with…

And finally, despite everything that has been stated in this article the fact is that many belt weighers are installed without any real knowledge of the required application and a great number work. Things begin to go wrong when a supplier hasn’t understood that the application is difficult and may require greater scrutiny. It is generally these cases that get the belt weighing industry a bad name. I have seen belt weighers installed in a catenary where the belt doesn’t touch the weigh idler until it is loaded, this is particularly prevalent on mobile plant. Any good weighing company can advise an end user what is required to the required weighing standards and if necessary, send an engineer to survey the application. If you require in depth information of the do’s and don’ts of belt weighing please apply to Lodestone and we will be happy to supply our free applications booklet.

For more informarion, please visit:

https://edir.bulk-online.com/profile...lectronics.htm

Attachments

lodstone_news (JPG)

Re: The Black Art Of Belt Weighing

Posted on 10. Jul. 2006 - 07:25

Thanks for a really top class thread.

John Gateley johngateley@hotmail.com www.the-credible-bulk.com

Re: The Black Art Of Belt Weighing

Posted on 12. Jul. 2006 - 03:50

I appreciate your effort to put in such great detail the requirements of the belt weigher. The fact that it is known as the black art because the factors affecting the performance of a belt weigher are so exhaustive that it is common to make an error on one or 2 points & then you know the end result. Also the price of the belt weigher does not justify the service it requires from the suppliers & which cannot be afforded. Lastly at the customers end the people who really handle the belt weighers are the technicians or the casual labours who are not properly trained & most of the belt weighers are killed by the service engineers of the suppliers or these plant technicians.

I have also observed that there was a trend by the consultants to suggest belt weighers on many conveyors in a steram of conveyors & the belt weighers were expected to match the readings after complicated process, for e.g having an belt weigher before feeding to a crusher & screen & then installing 2 belt weighers one after the screen & one for the unscreened & expecting that all thr readings of the 3 belt weighers will match & it possible to have a proper accounting is a big fallacy.

As per my experience belt weighers should be installed if absolutetly necessary & these belt weighers can really work if the plant personnel are committed.

Re: The Black Art Of Belt Weighing

Posted on 12. Jul. 2006 - 10:02

Dear P.J.Talreja,

Thank you for taking the time to reply.

Some of your points I agree with. Price is one of the exceptions. We at Lodestone have gone to considerabe trouble to ensure our prices are not only competitive but relatively low. We have done this by using the very latest technology. We do not look at the market and say what can it afford? We look at our costs, determine our profit margin and price the system accordingly. This generally results in a lower price than most of our competitors.

Regarding consultants, they tend to be more aware of plant operations and less aware of measurement and instrumentation.

I have been involved in multiple weighers on single material streams and have alway considered it a waste of money. However, it is good business but we would never recommend it.

It strikes me the best way to purchase a belt weigher is to have a very tight specification and make the supplier stick to it contractually over a period of say a year. This is where good engineering practice and understanding is vital in writing the contract.

When choosing a belt weigher for an application, one should always consider how it is to be calibrated and checked on a regular basis. (preferably with live load checks)

I still consider belt weighers have a bad reputation due to poor application engineering by the supplier. If the conveyor required for weighing is not suitable then we do not accept the contract.

Best Regards

Jon Scarrott

Untitled

Posted on 15. Jul. 2006 - 06:19

Jon,

I agree with the majority of your observations, but I have a question about the photo you posted. From the photo, your scale is located in a conveyor under the skirt boards, it has been our experience, not to locate under the skirts as the material build up between the skirts and the belting will apply a false load on the scale. Is this not a problem with your system?

regards, Todd Dietrich todd@kvsco.com Kaskaskia Valley Scale Co. http://www.kvsco.com

Belt Skirts

Posted on 15. Jul. 2006 - 10:27

Hi Todd,

I agree skirts can be a problem. In this particular case the conveyor carries paper and plastic waste. The conveyor is 2m wide and the product is diverted into the center of the conveyor at the feed point. The skirts in this case provide protection from windage rather than a method of containing the material.

One effective method we have used is to provide double skirts. The inner skirt about 5cm from the outer skirt and sitting up from the conveyor, so depending on the angle of repose of material the product drops between the two skirts but does not touch the outer skirt. As a rule of thumb I use a minimum of 3 diameters of the largest lump size to determine the height of the the inner skirt to the belt.

Of course the best way is to have no skirts at all.